Monday, September 12, 2016

The rumble in the jungle -- ANA vs. 4A’s




“In this corner… the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) a heavy-weight known for its pummeling attack.  And in the opposite corner the American Association of Advertising Agencies (4A’s) known for quick moves and ability to dodge an opponents attack.”

Media transparency… the issue which has shaken the advertising/media industry this year continues to be a discussion vs. a solution.  But where to go from here?  Is it the 4A’s of ANA’s responsibility to solve the issue?  Or is it the client?  What about the agency?  And how about the media property?

Yes to all of the above.

-       Associations. 
o    The ANA and 4A’s should “attempt” to come up with guidelines for both associations members. 
o    However, I don’t believe it’s possible that they could ever come together with a single guideline document. 
o    Does this take the teeth out of each organization?  Not sure, but time will tell.

-       Clients.           
o    Need to clearly define any financial compensation that the agency receives. This needs to include, but limited to, any cash rebates, discounts, bonus inventory, barter rebate, agency fees, media fees, etc.  
o    Next, clients need to clearly state what happens with those rebates, fees, etc. 
o    Who has to approve all of these compensation opportunities? 
o    It needs to be put in contract language in the Master Services Agreement and applicable across any/all units within a holding company.
o    Get tighter control over tracking of media spend and fees in general.
o    Take a hard look at the compensation model you have setup with your agency – perhaps you need to call off the Procurement Dept. and actually put a bit more money in the agencies pockets. 
o    Consider putting specific contractual language with your main media partners describing your expectations in regards to media rebates, etc.
o    Continuosly audit the agency.

-       Agencies.   
o    Get over it.  You and the clients agreed that a 3rd party audit was needed.  Now you didn’t agree to agree with the results, but come on, the results are pretty clear.  Just move forward and fix the issues.
o    Speak to your client about your compensation challenges… if the rebates were providing the revenue you needed to meet your financial targets then there’s a bigger issue.  Look most clients actually want you to make money.  But if a client’s procurement department has wacked away all your profit… it’s time to have a serious conversation with the client.
o    Don’t try to get squirm out of the issue with interpretive analysis of legal documents put forth by clients.
o    Be transparent – this is a chance to hit the “reset” button on your client relationships if you work it correctly.

-       Media Properties.  Ahhhh, I didn’t forget about you!  You’re part of the issue as well.
o    Stop playing the victim in these conversations… “I had to do it to get the business.”
o    You need to be transparent with clients on the full compensation picture – rebates, payments, discounts, etc.
o    Make your rate card and prices more transparent.  Break down the costs so clients can understand what they’re paying for. 
o    Stop playing both sides of the fence with the agency and clients.  Stop telling clients how the agency isn’t fair and stop telling the agency the client loved the idea.  You’re feeding the issue.

The Dalai Lama had it right when he said “A lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity”

See my previous posts on this subject on my Linked page or on my blog.


Scott

No comments:

Post a Comment